A little-known experiment launched in 2009 is about to revolutionize Georgia’s countryside. “Teach for Georgia (TG)” [1] is a small program administered by the National Center for Teachers’ Professional Development, seeking to stream new blood into the public education system. With a tiny annual budget of 212,000 GEL, TG was initially conceived as a publically funded “startup”, an attempt to think and act out-of-the box. Though starting small and mainly focusing on schools in remote mountain communities, TG has always been seen as potentially the Next Big Thing in Georgia’s faltering education system.
In essence, TG provides an alternative approach to teacher recruitment and training. An approach rooted in the observation that Georgia’s pedagogical universities are unable to attract young talent, becoming, instead, a refuge for students achieving the lowest scores on the national student examination test. An alternative, provided by TG, is to target university graduates and mid-career professionals who consider retiring or taking a break from their daily routines. Individuals carefully selected from a large pool of candidates (almost 300 in 2015) go through intensive pedagogical training organized by TG and get placed as teachers in remote and often desperate communities in the Georgian highlands. TG offers decent compensation (up to 1000GEL/month for teaching in isolated mountain locations). Far more importantly, however, it helps people find or redefine their purpose in life. Over the past 5 years, almost 550 TG teachers have gone on to serve in villages and small towns from Svaneti and Ajara to Racha and Samtskhe-Javakheti, serving as role models, teachers and community leaders.
Given TG’s phenomenal success, its budget was quadrupled by the Georgian Dream administration from about 500,000 GEL in 2012 to more than 2.1mln GEL in 2015. But a true revolution is lying ahead. With Cartu-International Charity Foundation and the Open Society Institute (OSI) of the Soros Foundation agreeing to invest 3.2bln USD in TG’s national rollout over the next five years ($0.8bln in 2016 and $0.6bln in 2017-2020), the program will go on record as the most successful education-focused startup in Eastern European history. A joint statement issued this morning (April 1, 2015) by President Margvelashvili and Bidzina Ivanishvili’s Cartu-International Charity Foundation unveils the principal elements of a “deep and comprehensive” reform to be implemented in Georgia’s public schooling system already next year.
- Starting in January 2016, TG will be transformed into a National Priority Project (NPP), an autonomous legal entity of public law assigned full responsibility for overhauling Georgia’s general education system. President Margvelashvili, an esteemed Georgian scholar and former minister of education, will chair TG’s Board of Directors, providing leadership and facilitating inter-agency coordination. The Board will include Chair of Cartu-International Charity Foundation Nikoloz Chkhetiani, Chair of OSI’s Education Support Program Bill Newton-Smith, UNICEF-Georgia Head Sascha Graumann, as well as prominent international scholars such as Nobel Prize-winning economist James Heckman , and Director at the Max Planck Institute for Physics Giorgi Dvali.
- A cornerstone of the proposed reform is the gradual transformation of Georgia’s pedagogical universities into Teacher Training Centers (TTC) providing intensive certificate courses in pedagogy. Instead of granting undergraduate degrees, TTCs will serve recent university graduates and professionals interested in joining the teaching profession, on the one hand, and current teachers willing to upgrade their pedagogical qualifications, on the other. While likely to meet fierce opposition from Ilya State University’s School of Education and other pedagogical universities, this measure is seen as key for restoring the teaching profession’s prestige and making sure that the next Georgian generation is educated by people who have adequate skills and professional qualifications.
- Leading Georgian universities will be encouraged to develop new MA-level and doctoral programs in pedagogy in order to experiment with new approaches (e.g. online learning, multi-grade and multi-language teaching) and bring the latest advances in cognitive psychology and pedagogical research to Georgia’s classrooms. A considerable part of TG funding will be devoted to this particular goal.
- TG will revamp the current teacher recruitment model. First, it will substitute a wide open door for what is now merely a hatch for excellent “vintage” candidates who may have served years in government or private sector jobs and are eager to try themselves in teaching. Second, it will recruit from among graduates of all university departments – math, natural sciences, social sciences and humanities, putting suitable candidates through intensive certificate training in pedagogy with the newly created Teacher Training Centers. Team teaching and counseling by seasoned colleagues will be used as a means of helping young teachers gain in confidence. In these two ways, TG will offer a dramatic improvement over the “those who can, do; those who can't, teach” status quo.
- Last but not least, to sustain the best human capital in education, TG with work with the Georgian government, UNICEF, philanthropic foundations and private businesses to dramatically improve teacher compensation. The average teacher salary today (about 500 GEL/month) is certainly too low for attracting new talent. Yet, paradoxically, it is also too high for older generation teachers to retire. As a result, Georgia is stuck with a very low student-to-teacher ratio (9:1 in 2014 compared to the OECD average of 13:1). To achieve future efficiency gains, TG will incentivize older teachers to retire by offering a generous compensation package. At the same time, it will engage philanthropic foundations and private businesses operating in Georgia’s regions to create endowed teacher posts in remote rural areas and difficult-to-reach mountain locations.
Tamar Sanikidze, Georgia’s current Minister Education and Science (MES) did not hide her excitement with the Teach for Georgia initiative in a follow up interview with ISET Policy Institute’s Nino Doghonadze: “our education system has reached a point of no return”, she said, “what we need is a completely new approach, not more of the same pro form a quality assurance and teacher-training-curricula-reform type of medicine. This is like beating a dead horse. We need new blood. And this is mainly about two things: prestige and compensation.”
A most revealing commentary was offered by Manana Panchulidze, a teacher with the village school in Dzevri (Imereti). “I have to wake up at 5am every morning to milk my two cows and cook for the family. My hands are full with house chores and farming. The ministry [of education] is coming up with new requirement and textbooks almost every year, but I have no time to prepare for classes, let alone learn anything new. At Dzevri we have one American Peace Corp volunteer, Alison Swanson. Why there are no Georgian volunteers? I think that children in our village deserve better.”
Lexo Kochlashvili, senior financial analyst with the Georgian Railways, was excited by the opportunity offered by TG. “This is an amazing initiative. I’ve just turned 46, and the thought of spending the rest of my life doing spreadsheet analysis is rather depressing. Our children have grown up. The son, Goga, is studying in Germany. Taso, our daughter, is a lawyer with DLA Piper. My wife and I are still full of energy, so why not try something else. Our family is originally from Kakheti, and so we thought of doing a few years in our ancestral village, teaching and helping with local administration. I am sure the Georgian Railways will find somebody else to do my job.”
* * *
“The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”, a famous saying goes, “unless that tree is growing on top of a hill”. The education quality debate in Georgia is about apple trees growing not on top of a hill but in a deep hole, with little light and no way to escape. As we have previously written on these pages, “more than half of Georgia’s population – the urban poor and subsistence farmers – have their children trapped in extremely low quality public schools that fail to present them with an equal opportunity, let alone prepare them for the 21st century knowledge economy”. For this reason, Georgia should be extremely grateful to Messrs. Ivanishvili and Margvelashvili for magnanimously setting aside their personal differences and offering the Georgian people a unique opportunity to break out of the vicious circle of poverty and inequality.
- ↑Teach for Georgia is not to be confused with the better known “Teach and Learn with Georgia” (TG) which recruited native speakers of foreign languages..”
Comments
Great, where do I sign up?.... But I am worried - what if I spend a year in the mountains and still can't redefine my purpose in life?
Shouldn't there be some alternatives - for example a GGG (Grow Grapes for Georgia), or at the very least a WLG (Write a Legislation for Georgia)?
I fully agree with the message of the article -- radical, groundbreaking reforms are needed in Georgia's school system.
The specific idea outlined here also makes perfect sense, but:
(a) I think the budget would not need to be so high (one would have to make exact calculations, but I would be surprised if $3.2 billion would be required).
(b) I doubt that it would pay off to spend money for involving prominent guys like Heckman and Dvali (unless they could be involved almost for free).
The main novelty proposed in this article, namely to open the teacher job to graduates of every subject, not only for people who went through a specialized pedagogical curriculum, is perfectly reasonable. To upgrade the pedagogical skills of those "career changers" with certificate courses, and maybe make the acquisition of such certificates a requirement for every teacher, would ensure that teachers are not fully ignorant about pedagogy. It would also solve the problem, which can be found in many other countries too, that there is usually a tendency of weak students to become teachers.
The general idea has been tried out already. In Germany, there is a scarcity of teachers, and about 10 years ago, it was allowed to everyone to become teacher after taking about 3 semester extra pedagogical training at the university (which could be attended while already working).
The idea put forward in this article is indeed very serious. It is somewhat sad that it is presented as a 1st of April prank, as this lets it appear merely as a kind of joke.